Given the significant market size for the cell phone industry and
the different types of products available, it's not surprising that
Qualcomm and
Texas Instruments offer a number of
different
baseband solutions. Their semiconductor devices have been
advancing to accommodate the wide variety of systems, taking into
account different size, power consumption and functionality
restrictions.
Qualcomm's road map has four platforms of baseband devices,
including value, multimedia, enhanced
multimedia and convergence. Each accommodates different levels
of cell phone offerings and the different networks on which they
operate. Recent Qualcomm devices analyzed by
Semiconductor Insights (SI),
such as the
MSM6260, fall within the multimedia
platform family. These devices are interesting due to the
process technology
migration and lithography shrink that have been implemented to
increase functionality without drastically increasing the die size
or power consumption.
Things have been quite interesting for Qualcomm recently. The
Nokia-Qualcomm licensing
agreement expired on April 9, and there is no new agreement. This
has some serious implications for Nokia, as it could prevent it from
selling its third-generation (3G) handsets that use Qualcomm parts,
of which there are many. Nokia offered Qualcomm $20 million to be
allowed to continue using the patents, claiming that the sum was a
"fair and reasonable" amount. Qualcomm disagreed, and subsequently
filed a demand for arbitration by the American Arbitration
Association. It will be of great interest to see how this issue is
resolved. Considering their strong positions, both Qualcomm and
Nokia have much to gain, as well as lose, from working together.
The Qualcomm mobile station
modem (MSM) 6260 is fabricated using
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Co.'s 65-nanometer process and is designed for mainstream 3G
mobile applications that operate on wideband-CDMA (UMTS) and GSM/GPRS/Edge
networks. The MSM6260 was one of the first devices to be fabricated
in TSMC's 65-nm technology that SI has seen. As a multimedia
platform, the MSM6260 allows for shortened design cycles and reduced
development costs. By incorporating a common chip set platform that
is optimized for
3G networks used throughout the world, it allows handset makers
to offer multiple device designs. It is also RF- and pin-compatible
with other
chip set solutions being offered by Qualcomm, such as the
MSM6245 and the
MSM6255A.
From 90 nm to 65 nm
A process predecessor to the MSM6260, the MSM6250A was fabricated
using TSMC's 90-nm
CMOS process technology. In late 2004, TSMC reported a number of
features and options for its 90-nm process. These have, in part,
evolved through the closer working relationships foundries have
developed with their customers to better accommodate design-specific
requirements. This cooperation is improving from generation to
generation and will likely continue as more integrated device
manufacturers consider the foundry option for their leading-edge
designs.
TSMC's triple-gate process is an example of that trend. This
option provides for multiple-gate dielectric thicknesses, helping to
remove design restrictions caused by core/IO combination
requirements. In addition, low-power processes for mobile
applications or high-performance processes for speed-sensitive
applications (such as gaming applications) are available.
TSMC introduced some technology changes in scaling its 90 nm to
65 nm. SI's analysis of the MSM6250A revealed that the device was
produced in what appears to be the 90-nm low-power process,
utilizing 80-nm minimum gate length, a dual gate process coupled
with conventional Cobalt silicide and a less aggressive six-layer
copper using top Al interconnect.
TSMC introduced its 65-nm process in early 2006. It claims to
have almost doubled the density of its 90-nm process, boasting a 50
percent increase in speed and 20 percent standby power reduction.
The company appears to have improved mobility by introducing a 3-D
process—induced strain associated with shallow trench isolation,
silicide and cap layer. With the introduction of nickel silicide for
ultrashallow junction formation, these changes have helped TSMC to
attain the speed and power requirements needed by its customers. In
addition, there are some increased benefits to the manufacturability
of the process, such as the contact etch stop performance of the Ni-silicide
that is required for ultrashallow junctions.
TSMC is now on its third generation of low-k dielectric
integration and fourth generation of Cu interconnect integration.
Qualcomm's MSM6260 was manufactured using a six-level Cu process,
also using top Al interconnect (similar to the 90-nm technology used
for the MSM6250A). Although this may have allowed Qualcomm a
straight shrink with minimal redesign for some of its reused
functional blocks, the die size of the MSM6260 is similar to that of
the MSM6250A. This indicates a significantly higher level of
functionality and more features than those used for the MSM6250A.
(Click on image to enlarge)
The scaling technology choices made by TSMC have allowed it to
increase the number of transistors per unit area, while delivering
on the most important feature to mobile applications designers such
as Qualcomm: power. Although the sidewall spacers have been slightly
modified to help scale the source and drain junction in the channel
regions and Ni-silicidation of the poly has replaced Co-silicide,
the 90-nm and 65-nm
transistor structures look similar. No paradigm shift in the
process technology appears to have been introduced beyond typical
evolution of techniques required for traditional scaling.
Most notable in the 6260 design is the
SRAM cell size reduction of almost 60 percent. This is in part
achieved by the more aggressive lithography as well as design rules
allowing closer contact-gate spacing.
Furthermore, decreasing inter-metal dielectric layer thickness
has helped scale aspect ratios of the metal lines. This can help
maintain liner thickness and step coverage in the lower sidewall
regions of the vias and achieve the highest-aspect-ratio metal
lines.
With a gate thickness of approximately 2 nm in both generations,
TSMC has traded speed and raw performance for reduced leakage and
power in this version of its process.
Design choices
In comparison, the Nokia
4377401
processor was fabricated in Texas Instruments' competitive 65-nm
low-power CMOS process technology and comes in a Nokia package. Like
the TSMC process, TI uses a six-level Cu interconnect process, with
a top Al layer and OSG low-k intermetal dielectrics. TI has also
introduced technologies similar to what TSMC introduced at 65 nm,
including Ni-silicide and strain engineering to improve both N- and
P-MOS transistor performance. The TI 65-nm process technology is
reported to shrink the 90-nm design area by half, leverage strained
silicon to boost transistor performance by 40 percent and reduce
leakage power from idle transistors by a factor of 1,000.
(Click on image to enlarge)
The design strategy appears to diverge when comparing the
significant difference between the die sizes of the Qualcomm and
Nokia devices. But one must
consider that they are also significantly different in function.
Qualcomm has apparently opted for increased functionality and
reduced form factor at the expense of reduced flexibility in process
design optimization. On the other hand, TI has chosen to maintain
some flexibility by decoupling the process and design interactions
likely to allow more independent optimization. This would require
more separate devices to be used in the multichip package than the
integrated approach would, depending on the system functionality
desired.
Going forward
Semiconductor manufacturers introduced a number of new techniques at
the 65-nm technology node. Notably, these introductions were strain
engineering for increased mobility and Ni-silicide to enable
ultrashallow junction architecture.
These processes enabled advances in
wireless multimedia product designs, resulting in an increased
transistor count per unit area and reduced power consumption. But
these are merely evolutionary techniques that are meant to
bridge the 45-nm node gap. It will be interesting to see what
innovative design techniques are used to fully realize a 45-nm
solution.
John Boyd (johnb@semiconductor.com) is product technology
manager, process, at Semiconductor Insights, a semiconductors
analysis firm in Kanata (Ontario). Boyd was a founding member of
SI's original Process Analysis group in 1995. After that, he worked
at Lam Research and at Nortel. He holds more than 60 U.S. patents
and has more than 40 pending applications. |